Publications
Search Google Scholar | Search PubMed
61.
Lu, WT; Sokoloff, JB; Sridhar, S
Comment on Journal Article
In: arXiv preprint cond-mat/0207689, 2002.
@article{lu2002comment,
title = {Comment on},
author = {WT Lu and JB Sokoloff and S Sridhar},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {arXiv preprint cond-mat/0207689},
abstract = {Valanju, Walser and Valanju (VWV) [1] have shown
that for a group consisting of two plane waves incident
on the interface between a material of positive refractive
index (PIM) and material of negative refractive index
(NIM), the group velocity refracts positively. Here we
show that this is true only for the special two plane wave
case constructed by VWV, but for generic localized wave
packets, the group refraction is generically negative.
The sum of two plane waves of wavevector and frequency (k1, ω1) and (k2, ω2), considered by VWV, can
be written as 2e
i(k0·r−ω0t)
cos[(1/2)(∆k · r − ∆ωt)],
where (k0, ω0) the average wavevector and frequency and
(∆k, ∆ω) denote their differences. Clearly, the argument
of the cosine is constant along planes, which propagate
in time along the direction of their normal, ∆k. We
have carried out numerical simulations of wave packets
incident on the PIM-NIM interface and for the 2-wave
case arrive at conclusions similar to VWV. For arbitrary
number of incident plane waves whose k vectors are all
parallel, the group refraction is again positive. Note that
in all these special cases the packet remains nonzero on
infinite planes.
Here we show that for any wave packet that is spatially
localized, the group refraction is generically negative.
For 3 (or more) waves whose wave vectors not aligned,
the group refraction will be negative. For example, consider three wave vectors in PIM in the x-z-plane, whose
magnitudes are, k − δk, k, k − δk and whose angles with
the z-axis are, θ − δθ, θ, θ + δθ, respectively. The dispersion k
2 = (ω
2 − ω
2
p
)(ω
2 − ω
2
b
)/c2
(ω
2 − ω
2
0
) were used for
NIM. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The wave packet
refracts negatively, in obvious contrast to VWV. As we
have seen, two plane waves result in a wave packet-like
structure which is constant along planes; the addition of
a third wave breaks the planes into localized wave packets
which refract negatively.
A packet constructed from a finite number of plane
waves will always give a collection of propagating wave
pulses, as seen in Fig. 1. A wave packet localized in one
region of space, as occurs in all experimental situations,
can only be constructed from a continuous distribution of
wavevectors. Consider such a wave packet incident from
outside the NIM, E = E0
R
d
2kf(k − k0)e
i(k·r−ω(k)t)
,
where ω(k) = ck. If f(k − k0) drops off rapidly as k
moves away from k0, ω(k) can be expanded in a Taylor
series to first order in k − k0 to a good approximation.
This gives, E = E0e
i(k0·r−ω(k0)t
g(r − ctk0/k0), where
g(R) = R
d
2kf(k−k0)e
i(k−k0)·R. Inside the NIM, k and
k0 in the argument of the exponent get replaced by kr
and kr0 which are related to k and k0 by Snell’s law.
Then the wave packet once it enters the NIM is given by
Er = E
′
0
e
i(kr0·r−ω(kr0)t
gr(r − vgrt), (1)
where gr(R) = R
d
2kf(k − k0)e
iR·[(k−k0)·∇kkr]
. Here
kr0 denotes kr evaluated at k = k0 and vgr = ∇kr ω(kr)
evaluated at kr = kr0. Thus, the refracted wave moves
with the group velocity vgr. Evaluation of Eq. (1) for
a Gaussian wave packet shows that the incident packet
gets distorted but the maximum of the packet moves at
vgr. For the case of an isotropic medium, considered by
VWV [1], the group velocity is anti-parallel to the wave
vector in the medium. Hence, the group velocity will be
refracted the same way as the wavevector is, contrary to
the claim of VWV [1].
Thus VWV’s statement that the “Group Refraction is
always positive” is true only for the very special (and
rare) wave packets constructed by them and is incorrect
for more general wave packets that are spatially localized.
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation, the Air Force Research Laboratories and the
Department of Energy.
W. T. Lu, J. B. Sokoloff and S. Sridhar
Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 360
Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Valanju, Walser and Valanju (VWV) [1] have shown
that for a group consisting of two plane waves incident
on the interface between a material of positive refractive
index (PIM) and material of negative refractive index
(NIM), the group velocity refracts positively. Here we
show that this is true only for the special two plane wave
case constructed by VWV, but for generic localized wave
packets, the group refraction is generically negative.
The sum of two plane waves of wavevector and frequency (k1, ω1) and (k2, ω2), considered by VWV, can
be written as 2e
i(k0·r−ω0t)
cos[(1/2)(∆k · r − ∆ωt)],
where (k0, ω0) the average wavevector and frequency and
(∆k, ∆ω) denote their differences. Clearly, the argument
of the cosine is constant along planes, which propagate
in time along the direction of their normal, ∆k. We
have carried out numerical simulations of wave packets
incident on the PIM-NIM interface and for the 2-wave
case arrive at conclusions similar to VWV. For arbitrary
number of incident plane waves whose k vectors are all
parallel, the group refraction is again positive. Note that
in all these special cases the packet remains nonzero on
infinite planes.
Here we show that for any wave packet that is spatially
localized, the group refraction is generically negative.
For 3 (or more) waves whose wave vectors not aligned,
the group refraction will be negative. For example, consider three wave vectors in PIM in the x-z-plane, whose
magnitudes are, k − δk, k, k − δk and whose angles with
the z-axis are, θ − δθ, θ, θ + δθ, respectively. The dispersion k
2 = (ω
2 − ω
2
p
)(ω
2 − ω
2
b
)/c2
(ω
2 − ω
2
0
) were used for
NIM. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The wave packet
refracts negatively, in obvious contrast to VWV. As we
have seen, two plane waves result in a wave packet-like
structure which is constant along planes; the addition of
a third wave breaks the planes into localized wave packets
which refract negatively.
A packet constructed from a finite number of plane
waves will always give a collection of propagating wave
pulses, as seen in Fig. 1. A wave packet localized in one
region of space, as occurs in all experimental situations,
can only be constructed from a continuous distribution of
wavevectors. Consider such a wave packet incident from
outside the NIM, E = E0
R
d
2kf(k − k0)e
i(k·r−ω(k)t)
,
where ω(k) = ck. If f(k − k0) drops off rapidly as k
moves away from k0, ω(k) can be expanded in a Taylor
series to first order in k − k0 to a good approximation.
This gives, E = E0e
i(k0·r−ω(k0)t
g(r − ctk0/k0), where
g(R) = R
d
2kf(k−k0)e
i(k−k0)·R. Inside the NIM, k and
k0 in the argument of the exponent get replaced by kr
and kr0 which are related to k and k0 by Snell’s law.
Then the wave packet once it enters the NIM is given by
Er = E
′
0
e
i(kr0·r−ω(kr0)t
gr(r − vgrt), (1)
where gr(R) = R
d
2kf(k − k0)e
iR·[(k−k0)·∇kkr]
. Here
kr0 denotes kr evaluated at k = k0 and vgr = ∇kr ω(kr)
evaluated at kr = kr0. Thus, the refracted wave moves
with the group velocity vgr. Evaluation of Eq. (1) for
a Gaussian wave packet shows that the incident packet
gets distorted but the maximum of the packet moves at
vgr. For the case of an isotropic medium, considered by
VWV [1], the group velocity is anti-parallel to the wave
vector in the medium. Hence, the group velocity will be
refracted the same way as the wavevector is, contrary to
the claim of VWV [1].
Thus VWV’s statement that the “Group Refraction is
always positive” is true only for the very special (and
rare) wave packets constructed by them and is incorrect
for more general wave packets that are spatially localized.
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation, the Air Force Research Laboratories and the
Department of Energy.
W. T. Lu, J. B. Sokoloff and S. Sridhar
Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 360
Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.
that for a group consisting of two plane waves incident
on the interface between a material of positive refractive
index (PIM) and material of negative refractive index
(NIM), the group velocity refracts positively. Here we
show that this is true only for the special two plane wave
case constructed by VWV, but for generic localized wave
packets, the group refraction is generically negative.
The sum of two plane waves of wavevector and frequency (k1, ω1) and (k2, ω2), considered by VWV, can
be written as 2e
i(k0·r−ω0t)
cos[(1/2)(∆k · r − ∆ωt)],
where (k0, ω0) the average wavevector and frequency and
(∆k, ∆ω) denote their differences. Clearly, the argument
of the cosine is constant along planes, which propagate
in time along the direction of their normal, ∆k. We
have carried out numerical simulations of wave packets
incident on the PIM-NIM interface and for the 2-wave
case arrive at conclusions similar to VWV. For arbitrary
number of incident plane waves whose k vectors are all
parallel, the group refraction is again positive. Note that
in all these special cases the packet remains nonzero on
infinite planes.
Here we show that for any wave packet that is spatially
localized, the group refraction is generically negative.
For 3 (or more) waves whose wave vectors not aligned,
the group refraction will be negative. For example, consider three wave vectors in PIM in the x-z-plane, whose
magnitudes are, k − δk, k, k − δk and whose angles with
the z-axis are, θ − δθ, θ, θ + δθ, respectively. The dispersion k
2 = (ω
2 − ω
2
p
)(ω
2 − ω
2
b
)/c2
(ω
2 − ω
2
0
) were used for
NIM. The results are shown in Fig. 1. The wave packet
refracts negatively, in obvious contrast to VWV. As we
have seen, two plane waves result in a wave packet-like
structure which is constant along planes; the addition of
a third wave breaks the planes into localized wave packets
which refract negatively.
A packet constructed from a finite number of plane
waves will always give a collection of propagating wave
pulses, as seen in Fig. 1. A wave packet localized in one
region of space, as occurs in all experimental situations,
can only be constructed from a continuous distribution of
wavevectors. Consider such a wave packet incident from
outside the NIM, E = E0
R
d
2kf(k − k0)e
i(k·r−ω(k)t)
,
where ω(k) = ck. If f(k − k0) drops off rapidly as k
moves away from k0, ω(k) can be expanded in a Taylor
series to first order in k − k0 to a good approximation.
This gives, E = E0e
i(k0·r−ω(k0)t
g(r − ctk0/k0), where
g(R) = R
d
2kf(k−k0)e
i(k−k0)·R. Inside the NIM, k and
k0 in the argument of the exponent get replaced by kr
and kr0 which are related to k and k0 by Snell’s law.
Then the wave packet once it enters the NIM is given by
Er = E
′
0
e
i(kr0·r−ω(kr0)t
gr(r − vgrt), (1)
where gr(R) = R
d
2kf(k − k0)e
iR·[(k−k0)·∇kkr]
. Here
kr0 denotes kr evaluated at k = k0 and vgr = ∇kr ω(kr)
evaluated at kr = kr0. Thus, the refracted wave moves
with the group velocity vgr. Evaluation of Eq. (1) for
a Gaussian wave packet shows that the incident packet
gets distorted but the maximum of the packet moves at
vgr. For the case of an isotropic medium, considered by
VWV [1], the group velocity is anti-parallel to the wave
vector in the medium. Hence, the group velocity will be
refracted the same way as the wavevector is, contrary to
the claim of VWV [1].
Thus VWV’s statement that the “Group Refraction is
always positive” is true only for the very special (and
rare) wave packets constructed by them and is incorrect
for more general wave packets that are spatially localized.
This work was supported by the National Science
Foundation, the Air Force Research Laboratories and the
Department of Energy.
W. T. Lu, J. B. Sokoloff and S. Sridhar
Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 360
Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.
Sorry, no publications matched your criteria.